home | sitemap | terms | ubc | contact us    

 

 

PROGRAM

FACULTY

STUDENTS

EVENTS

LINKS

HOME

NEW HOME


This page is retired.

Click here
to visit
the newly designed version
with this content

 


PROGRAM

COURSES

NEUROSCIENCE 501

CRITIQUE ASSIGNMENT





Page Critique Neuroscience 501

Instructions for the written critique:

You must number your responses. You may single space with 1 inch margins and no type smaller than 12 point. Anything over 2 pages (excluding references cited) will not be read.

  1. Title of paper and citation (also include a copy of the paper).
  2. Summary. Concise summary of the experimental problem, hypotheses that address this problem, results, and conclusions.
    Limit yourself to 8 lines total.

    Then provide a more detailed discussion of the following:

  3. What is the experimental problem? Why is this problem important and worth studying?
  4. What hypotheses are put forward to address the experimental problem?
  5. How are the hypotheses tested? List critical experiments (methodology) and the logic.
  6. Do the experiments fully address the hypotheses? Are there other interpretations?
  7. What future experiments would you do? Be creative — don't just say that you would do a mouse knock-out of the protein.


Oral presentations

For those who are presenting (you will present 1 of the 4 papers):
Present a 10 min synopsis of this critique to the class (may be shorter if the class is large). There will be 5 min. for discussion at the end. You can show up to 8 slides if you want. For the presentation start with point #3 (do not state the summary #2). Convince the class that this subject is worth studying. Also state the hypotheses that are tested and the experiments that test the hypotheses. Then discuss the limitations and the possible future directions and experiments. You may want to select some provocative points to stimulate discussion with the rest of the class. As the presenter you will field the questions. The instructors will wait until after the students ask their questions before they raise their hands. Therefore, a good presentation will stimulate discussion among the students with minimal if any involvement (questions) from the instructors.
Furthermore, check out the
Suggestions on 2009 500 critiques mod 2 from T. Murphy.

If you are presenting, you will still turn in a written critique.




 

 

 

Learn more:

NRSC 500

NRSC 501

CPSC 532
(formerly
MECH 550)

STAT 540

Electives

Anatomy/Math

 

Also see:

Admissions

Guidelines

Courses

Seminars

Lifestyle

 

 

 Copyright 2002 - All Rights Reserved - Graduate Program in Neuroscience